| News | Business | Fleet

Which EV Fleet Infrastructure Ownership Model is Right for my Business?

Increasingly, many companies are exploring other ownership models to the traditional upfront buying model when implementing their EV charging infrastructure. Mer also offers an alternative, Charging as a Service (CaaS), this article explains the differences and benefits to each model.

A row of white delivery vans with a red van in the middle.

Overview

No Fleet EV charging infrastructure solution is the same. Every commercial fleet has different needs depending on haulage needs, location, budgets, fleet sizes and many more factors. Therefore, there needs to be different models to support the scaling and growth of an EV fleet throughout its lifetime.

Traditionally EV fleet operators would pay a company to install the required EV chargers and other infrastructure, with the infrastructure being owned by the company outright once the handover is completed. However, for many companies this did not fit their transition plan for a variety of reasons.

What is Charging as a Service?

Charging as a Service is when the Charge Point Operator (CPO) maintains overall ownership of the chargers and the company instead pays for the power usage. Often CaaS is accompanied by robust Service Level Agreements (SLAs) and 24/7 support.

What are the benefits of Charging as a Service?

Firstly, by utilising CaaS, companies can avoid the high upfront costs associated with purchasing, installing and maintaining the EV charging infrastructure. This means that fleets can focus on spending their CapEx on purchasing the EVs to populate their fleet.

CaaS also allows for greater scalability, due to the costs being distributed. This is perfect for pilot programs whereby for the duration of the trial, the fleet operator could use CaaS to understand the best EV depot locations, usage levels and other nuances while not having to worry about paying a large sum of money upfront.

For businesses and organisations with smaller fleets, CaaS enables them to transition their fleet to electric and as mentioned before, avoid up-front costs that might not be affordable for them. Large multi-depot fleets also benefit from CaaS as it allows them to expand and scale their operations depending on usage. By sidestepping the burden of operational infrastructure maintenance, large fleets can save on costs and time. Not only this but only having to budget for the more predictable usage costs means that financial forecasting is much easier.

Finally, a business or organisation might choose to utilise CaaS as an exercise in risk mitigation. Due to the ownership of the charging infrastructure sitting with the CPO, the risks are shared between the fleet owner and the CPO. The SLAs that are within a CaaS agreement robustly insulate the fleet operator from risk.

Obviously, for fleet operators who wish to maintain absolute ownership over their infrastructure, buying upfront is the best choice. But for everyone else, CaaS offers a compelling model to empower your own fleet transition.

Find out more

For more information visit our depot charging page with e-guide  to find out more about how Mer can help to implement the EV fleet charging infrastructure that is right for you.

Mer UK

Dominic Whaley

About the author

Dominic joined Mer UK in November 2024 as Content and Communication Manager. With 6 years’ experience in technology and economics writing, Dom now uses his expertise to help Mer in communicating the benefits of Mer’s services.